U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Bidirectional Associations Between Acceptability of Violence and Intimate Partner Violence From Adolescence to Young Adulthood

NCJ Number
Psychology of Violence Volume: 9 Issue: 1 Dated: 2019 Pages: 108-116
Ryan C. Shorey; Paula Fite; Elizabeth D. Torres; Gregory L. Stuart; Jeff R. Temple
Date Published
9 pages

This study examined bidirectional associations between the acceptability of intimate partner violence (IPV) and the perpetration of IPV from adolescence into young adulthood.


Beliefs about the acceptability of intimate partner violence (IPV) are associated with the perpetration of IPV among adolescents; however, minimal research has examined whether this association persists across time or whether there is a bidirectional association between acceptability of IPV and the perpetration of IPV. In the current study, a sample of diverse high school students (N = 1,042; 56 percent female) from the Southwestern United States was assessed each year for 6 consecutive years. At each assessment, participants completed measures of the acceptability of IPV and psychological and physical IPV perpetration. The mean age of the sample at the first assessment was 15.09 years (SD = 0.79). Structural equation modeling demonstrated that the acceptability of male-to-female IPV and acceptability of female-to-male IPV were not consistent predictors of one's own IPV perpetration over time. In addition, minimal evidence was found for a bidirectional association between acceptability of IPV and one's own IPV perpetration over time. Moreover, minimal sex differences were evident, and there were no differences based on race/ethnicity. The study concluded that despite the stability of beliefs about the acceptability of IPV over time from adolescence to young adulthood, findings suggest that the acceptability of IPV is not a robust predictor of one's own IPV perpetration during this developmental period. The implications of targeting beliefs about IPV in prevention and intervention programs are discussed. (publisher abstract modified)