NCJ Number
78470
Editor(s)
B H Olsson
Date Published
1981
Length
84 pages
Annotation
For those developing and implementing classification systems for inmates, probationers, and parolees, these papers describe development techniques for such systems and the effectiveness of classification systems in Wisconsin, Florida, and Oregon. A proposed inmate classification system in Minnesota is also detailed.
Abstract
A psychologist discusses the management classification system introduced to facilitate administration at the Federal Correctional Institution in Tallahassee, Fla. He describes the institution, the classification system, and the results of its use after 1 and 2 years. After the first year, the assault rate was reduced significantly, and after 2 years, institutional violence had stayed at the reduced level. The classification system was based primarily on the Megargee Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory typology of offenders in conjunction with systematic ratings of inmate behavior and records. Oregon's system for determining custody classification and levels of supervision for inmates, parolees, probationers, and other State Corrections Division clients enrolled in a work release program is described by a correctional administrator. He explains how to use the matrix, which is based on a Criminal History Risk Score and Offense Severity Rating Score, and supports the belief that an explicit matrix system is a rational approach to correctional decisionmaking. He notes that adoption of clearly defined decisionmaking standards strengthens the position of corrections workers in their use of discretion and reduces management problems caused by clients' feelings of frustration. The Wisconsin classification system, applicable to the State's urban and farming areas, is described in another article. The system is designed to move clients to lower levels of supervision as their need for services is met. Its risk assessment scale has proved to be a valid predictor of future criminal activity. Another system described by research analysts is the proposed inmate classification system for adult offenders committed to the Minnesota Department of Corrections. The system is based on specific principles ranked in order of importance beginning with public safety. This system permits the department to classify inmates into risk categories and assign them appropriate security levels. Data tables, references, or footnotes are included in most papers. For individual articles, see NCJ 74433 and NCJ 78471-73.