This article presents considerations for risk assessments used to reduce recidivism of people under community supervision gathered from participants of the National Institute of Justice’s Recidivism Forecasting Challenge.
This article shares considerations for designing, implementing, and understanding risk assessments used to reduce recidivism of people under community supervision. These insights are gleaned from 27 data scientists who participated in focus groups during the National Institute of Justice’s Recidivism Challenge Winners Symposium. Analyses revealed three primary themes: design considerations, implementation, and increasing awareness and understanding of risk assessments. Critical aspects of the design phase include validating the tool, incorporating field data that account for real-time changes, and adopting strategies to address false positives/negatives and the model’s complexity. Upon the tool’s development, practitioners are recommended to devise an implementation plan, balance attention to risk with client-focused needs, and exercise modest discretion while considering algorithmic results. Recognizing the value predictive instruments bring to decision-making and identifying their limitations is needed to increase understanding for all stakeholders. Collaboration and dialogue between tool developers and practitioners are crucial at every stage.
© The Author(s) 2023
This work was either partially or fully completed during the authors time as Research Assistants at the National Institute of Justice. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice or the U.S. Department of Justice.