U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Kamehameha Conditional Release Center - An In-Community Residential Program - Evaluation and Recommendations

NCJ Number
86360
Author(s)
W Matsuo; R Salisbury
Date Published
1981
Length
58 pages
Annotation
This study presents evaluation procedures, findings, and recommendations for Hawaii's Kamehameha Conditional Release Center, a residential facility that acts as an alternative to traditional incarceration for selected persons not requiring secure confinement.
Abstract
Program clients are selected on the basis of indicating a low threat to community safety and having high potential for rehabilitation. The core of the program is the contingency contract, which specifies in written form the behaviors the resident agrees to perform as well as the reward to be earned from their completion. Although furlough hours are the primary reinforcers of desired behavior, a token economy acts as an intermediate reinforcing system. The group process is the means for coordinating other program components. Evaluation data were collected on all residents of the program from its inception in April 1973 until May 30, 1978 (n=51). Of the total, 17 completed the program and were paroled, while 20 failed and were returned to prison. At the time of the evaluation, 14 were still in the program. The successful and unsuccessful groups were compared in a computer search for significant variables influencing success and failure. The successful resident is between 20 and 30 years-old, has less than four previous convictions, has a job skill, has a high school education, and has no previous commitment. Over 24 months the successful clients have not been returned to prison for a new commitment. Program success appears to be related to the careful selection process, the small group, and the effectiveness of the program. Seven recommendations for improving the program are offered and 15 references are listed. Forms used in the program are appended.

Downloads

No download available