U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Reconciling Alternative to Incarceration and Treatment Mandates with a Consumer Choice Housing First Model: A Qualitative Study of Individuals with Psychiatric Disabilities

NCJ Number
240383
Journal
Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice Volume: 12 Issue: 4 Dated: July - September 2012 Pages: 382-408
Author(s)
Ana Stefancic, M.A.; Larissa Hul, B.A.; Colleen Gillespie, Ph.D.; John Jost, Ph.D.; Sam Tsemberis, Ph.D.; Heather Jones, M.A.
Date Published
August 2012
Length
27 pages
Annotation
The authors of this study sought to understand how individuals experienced participating in a Housing First (HF) program, which is designed to operate along principles of permanent housing, consumer choice, and harm reduction, while simultaneously participating in an alternative to incarceration (ATI) program.
Abstract
This study sought to understand how individuals experienced participating in a Housing First (HF) program, which is designed to operate along principles of permanent housing, consumer choice, and harm reduction, while simultaneously participating in an alternative to incarceration (ATI) program that incorporates treatment mandates, abstinence monitoring, and court reporting which tend to be in tension with the HF model. Analysis of semi-structured qualitative interviews with 20 participants suggests that though participants recognized the constraints of the ATI program and legal mandates, they somewhat surprisingly experienced the HF program in accordance with the model's stated principles. The majority of participants remained in the HF program after 4 years and reported positive outcomes, which many attributed to having a home of their own. Having the ATI program serve as a mediator with the criminal justice system may have allowed the HF program to have a buffer between the participant and the legal system and helped keep the housing and consumer-driven services separate from explicit legal requirements. Abstract published by arrangement with Taylor and Francis.