U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Suspended Sentences in New South Wales

NCJ Number
204261
Author(s)
Georgia Brignell; Patrizia Poletti
Date Published
November 2003
Length
16 pages
Annotation
After examining the law and use of suspended sentences (a sentence of imprisonment that has been imposed but not executed) in New South Wales (Australia) courts, this report presents findings from an assessment of the implementation and impact of suspended sentences.
Abstract
The suspended sentence was introduced as a sentencing option in New South Wales (NSW) on April 3, 2000, following a recommendation of the NSW Law Reform Commission, which concluded that suspended sentences were useful in situations where the seriousness of an offense had mitigating circumstances that justified the offender's conditional release. The Commission advised that suspended sentences are appropriate when other forms of conditional release do not allow for a sufficient element of denunciation of the offense. In applying statistical analysis to the use of the suspended sentence in NSW since its introduction, this study focused on the frequency of its use in the local, higher, and children's courts; the most common duration of suspended sentences imposed by the courts; the impact of suspended sentences on sentencing patterns in the courts; and whether there has been any "net widening" or "sentence escalation." The study found that 9,278 suspended sentences have been imposed in the local courts and 894 in the higher courts up to December 31, 2002, accounting for 4.2 percent of all penalties imposed in the local courts in which imprisonment was an available sanction. Suspended sentences accounted for 11.7 percent of penalties in the higher courts. The offense for which suspended sentences were most often imposed in the local courts was driving while disqualified. In the higher courts, the offense most often receiving a suspended sentence was supplying less than a commercial quantity of a prohibited drug. In the local courts, magistrates most often imposed sentences of 6 or 12 months; and judges in the higher courts were most likely to impose terms of 24 months. Although the legislation requires that suspended sentences be strictly imposed as an alternative to full-time custody, the statistical analysis suggests that courts sometimes impose suspended sentences in place of less severe penalties, such as community service orders and good-behavior bonds. Thus, there is little evidence to date that suspended sentences have contributed to any significant reduction in the prison population. Although the statistics suggest "net-widening" as an effect of suspended sentences, the sentencing patterns observed may be a result of other factors, such as harsher sentencing practices generally. Still, the relatively infrequent use of the suspended sentence may indicate a need to increase its use before there will be a noticeable impact on the prison population in NSW. 4 tables, 2 figures, and 72 notes