This paper clarifies several points from a previous publication which missed a constant in Assumption 3 and another aspect of Assumption 4, and then provides examples to show that the assumptions after the clarification has been made are consistent with previously published assumptions.
In this clarification of assumptions in the relationship between the Bayes Decision Rule and the Whitened Cosine Similarity Measure, this paper first clarifies Assumption 3 (which misses a constant) and Assumption 4 (where the whitened pattern vectors represent the whitened means) in the paper ";The Bayes Decision Rule Induced Similarity Measures"; (IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1086- 1090, June 2007) and then provides examples to show that the assumptions after the clarification are consistent. (Published abstract provided)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Police Culture and Officer Behavior: Application of a Multilevel Framework
- Certification of Standard Reference Material 2323: Step Height Standard for Areal Surface Topography Measurement
- A Review of the Evolution of the NCS-NCVS Police Reporting and Response Questions and Their Application to Older Women Experiencing Violent Victimization