Victim resistance was categorized as forceful, nonforceful, a combination of the two, and no resistance. The types of victim resistance used and their impact on physical injury and crime completion varied with victim and offender characteristics, the crime setting, and whether or not the offender used a weapon. Generally, nonforceful resistance was related to more favorable victim outcomes. Victims who resisted by screaming, running away, reasoning with their attackers, or other nonforceful means were less likely to be injured and more likely to avoid completion of the crime. These findings are tempered by research limitations. The National Crime Survey excludes crimes in which the victim dies, and it does not obtain data on the sequencing of victim and offender actions, so it cannot be known whether resistance preceded or followed attack. Tabular and graphic data and 46 references. (Author abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Artificial Neural Network System for Classification of Offenders in Murder and Rape Cases
- Coping Patterns over Time and the Association with Stress, Depression and Self-Efficacy Among Adolescents: Latent Transition Analysis
- Prison Versus Probation in California - Implications for Crime and Offender Recidivism