This paper challenges the widely shared view that the United States and international frameworks regulating terrorist finance and money laundering (AML/CFT) is productive and effective.
Through a careful look at the evidence regarding the formal and informal fund transfer systems, this paper shows that security, crime control, and economic policy objectives are systematically frustrated by ill-conceived and misapplied rules. U.S. federal and state regulations in particular illustrate how unrealistic, unaffordable, and counter-productive are current arrangements. The paper concludes with some suggestions about how to reverse the ongoing fact-free policymaking process. (Published abstract provided)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Correctional Officer Safety and Use of Safety Equipment in Correctional Facilities
- Restoring Promise: Positive Research Results from a Program that Aims to Transform Correctional Culture
- Media Contact and Posttraumatic Stress in Employees of New York City Area Businesses after the September 11 Attacks