The BJS data have the potential to help support democratic policing, provide baseline data on use of force for comparative statistical reporting and research purposes, and enable strong local checks on police abuses, provided their validity and reliability can be demonstrated. Findings from the current study indicate that the BJS data suffer from serious measurement flaws, do not provide a valid and reliable basis for comparative statistical reporting and research purposes, and should not be relied on for purposes of litigation. (Publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Confirmation Bias and Other Systemic Causes of Wrongful Convictions: A Sentinel Events Perspective
- Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments
- Media Contact and Posttraumatic Stress in Employees of New York City Area Businesses after the September 11 Attacks