ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF OFFERING SELECTED ARRESTED DRUG OFFENDERS IN-PATIENT TREATMENT, FOCUSING ON ELIGIBILITY, ADMITTANCE, AND CONSEQUENCES OF DIVERSION.
THE MASSACHUSETTS COMPREHENSIVE DRUG ABUSE AND REHABILITATION AND TREATMENT ACT, WHICH BECAME EFFECTIVE ON JANUARY 1, 1971, PROVIDES THE STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION FOR THE DIVERSION OF CERTAIN ARRESTED DRUG-RELATED OFFENDERS FROM THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM TO A TREATMENT FACILITY. THIS REPORT DISCUSSES THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF UTILIZING AUTHORIZATION TO DIVERT DRUG OFFENDERS AND UTILIZES THE MASSACHUSETTS EXPERIENCE TO IDENTIFY THE FACTORS IN THE STRUCTURE AND ADMINISTRATION OF DIVERSION PROGRAMS THAT ARE DETERMINATIVE OF THE PROGRAMS' IMPACT ON OFFENDERS AND THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. SPECIFICALLY DISCUSSED ARE THE ELIGIBLE CLASS OF DRUG-RELATED OFFENDERS, THE PROCESSES OF SCREENING, EXAMINATION, COURT DECISION, COMMITMENT, AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF DIVERSION FOR THE DEFENDANT. THE PROBLEMS MASSACHUSETTS ENCOUNTERED ARE DISCUSSED AND GUIDELINES FOR FUTURE DIVERSIONARY PROGRAMS ARE PRESENTED. THE MASSACHUSETTS EXPERIENCE DEMONSTRATES THE NECESSITY FOR CENTRALIZED PLANNING AND COORDINATION OF DIVERSION PROGRAMS. (AUTHOR ABSTRACT MODIFIED) (SNI ABSTRACT)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Metal pollution investigation of Goldman Park, Middletown Ohio: Evidence for steel and coal pollution in a high child use setting
- Step toward Roadside Sensing: Noninvasive Detection of a THC Metabolite from the Sweat Content of Fingerprints
- Revisiting the STRmix™ likelihood ratio probability interval coverage considering multiple factors