The 2009 National Research Council report, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward, was highly critical of what was passing for science in some fields of forensics and had an immediate impact on law enforcement, crime laboratories, courtrooms, and the broader scientific community. The efforts to improve forensic science have been significant and ongoing since the National Research Council report, but has the problem been solved? Does the forensic testimony now introduced in court rest on solid scientific ground? This article examines those questions and provides an overview of the changing landscape of forensic science.
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Personal Identification Using Frontal Sinus Coding Methods: The Effect of Mixed Image Modality Comparisons
- Collaborative Exercise: Analysis of Age Estimation Using a QIAGEN Protocol and the PyroMark Q48 Platform
- Enhancing Corporate Crime Enforcement with Machine Learning—A Multidisciplinary Risk Factor Approach