This article explores the criminal justice problem of mistaken eyewitness identification; describing the research sample, methodology, and findings regarding participants’ memory, identification accuracy, and innocent bystander familiarity.
Unconscious transference (UT) is a potential explanation for an eyewitness identifying a familiar but innocent suspect from a lineup. The authors conducted a large experiment (N = 31,612) to test three UT theories (automatic processing/familiarity, poor source retrieval, and memory blending) by manipulating memory strength for the perpetrator versus the bystander, as well as their physical similarity. Participants were randomly assigned to view a fair simultaneous lineup containing the perpetrator, the bystander, an innocent suspect never seen before, or both the perpetrator and bystander. The authors found several forms of evidence of UT, but it was much weaker when: (a) the bystander was dissimilar from the perpetrator, and (b) the perpetrator was viewed for longer than the bystander. Both automatic processing/familiarity and poor source retrieval received the most support, with memory blending a distant third. Last, UT harmed the confidence–accuracy relationship. The authors recommend additional eyewitness research involving familiar innocent suspects. (Published Abstract Provided)
Downloads
No download available
Similar Publications
- Testing Gender-Differentiated Models of the Mechanisms Linking Polyvictimization and Youth Offending: Numbing and callousness versus dissociation and borderline traits
- Extraction of shoe-print patterns from impression evidence using Conditional Random Fields
- Do Crime Hot Spots Move? Exploring the Effects of the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem and Modifiable Temporal Unit Problem on Crime Hot Spot Stability