This is an outline of the findings of a NIJ-sponsored study that identified 10 statistically significant case factors that distinguish a wrongful conviction from a "near miss" case (a case in which an innocent defendant was acquitted or had charges dismissed before trial).
Wrongful convictions were significantly more likely to involve younger defendants with a criminal history. Factors related to the prosecution's case were a weak package of evidence and the prosecution's withholding of exculpatory evidence. Types of problems with evidence were lying by a non-eyewitness; unintentional misidentification by an eyewitness, and misinterpretation of forensic evidence at trial. Other factors in wrongful convictions were a weak defense, the defendant offered a family witness, and a pervasive "punitive" culture in the State where the trial was held. This brief report on the study provides information on how to access a more comprehensive summary of the report, internet access to a video of the presentation of study findings at a seminar, and an announcement of a web-based seminar on the study in mid-April 2013.
- Intensive Supervision for Court-Involved Youth (vs. Traditional Probation)
- An Evaluation of Victim Centered, Trauma Informed Interview Training for Sexual Assault Investigators using Standardized Patient Actors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Evaluability Assessment of the Weinberg Center for Elder Justice's Elder Abuse Shelter Services