U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

The Development of Attitudes toward Intimate Partner Violence: An Examination of Key Correlates among a Sample of Young Adults

NCJ Number
307631
Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence Volume: 34 Issue: 7 Dated: 2019 Pages: 1357-1387
Author(s)
Jennifer E. Copp; Peggy C. Giordano; Monica A. Longmore; Wendy D. Manning
Date Published
2019
Length
31 pages
Annotation

This paper provides an empirical examination of factors associated with attitudes toward intimate partner violence in predictive models; it describes specific conditions under which IPV may be deemed justifiable; examines extra-familial factors for a more comprehensive account of factors associated with attitudes toward IPV; and it focuses particular attention on the role of gender, including whether the factors associated with attitudinal acceptance of IPV are similar for men and women.

Abstract

Social learning theory remains one of the leading explanations of intimate partner violence (IPV). Research on attitudes toward IPV represents a logical extension of the social learning tradition, as it is intuitive to expect that individuals exposed to violence in the family of origin may internalize behavioral scripts for violence and adopt attitudes accepting of IPV. Yet despite this assumed link between family violence and attitudes toward IPV, few studies have empirically examined factors associated with the development of such attitudes. Using data from the Toledo Adolescent Relationship Study (TARS), the authors examine the role of family violence on the adoption of attitudes accepting of IPV among a sample of young adults. The current investigation contributes to existing literature on attitudes toward IPV by doing the following: providing an empirical examination of factors associated with attitudes toward IPV in predictive models; relying on a multifaceted index, describing specific conditions under which IPV may be deemed justifiable; examining extra-familial factors, in addition to family violence exposure, to provide a more comprehensive account of factors associated with attitudes toward IPV; and focusing particular attention on the role of gender, including whether the factors associated with attitudinal acceptance of IPV are similar for men and women. Findings indicated considerable variation in overall endorsement of attitudes regarding the use of violence across conditions, with greater endorsement among women. Consistent with social learning approaches to IPV, exposure to violence in the family of origin was associated with attitudes toward IPV. Yet findings also signaled the salience of factors beyond the family, including a range of sociodemographic, relationship, and adult status characteristics. The authors also discuss the relevance of their findings for future theorizing and research in the area of attitudes toward IPV. Publisher Abstract Provided