U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Diversion Program for Juvenile Offenders - The Experience of Ingham County, Michigan

NCJ Number
72184
Journal
Juvenile and Family Court Journal Volume: 31 Issue: 3 Dated: (August 1980) Pages: 53-62
Author(s)
M Bauer; G Bordeaux; J Cole; W S Davidson; C Mitchell; D Singleton; A Martinez
Date Published
1980
Length
10 pages
Annotation
In an experimental Michigan juvenile court diversion project involving highly organized intervention into offenders' lives by student volunteers, the project's subjects showed lower recidivism rates than members of control groups.
Abstract
The project was a joint effort between the University of Michigan and the administration and staff of the Ingham County Juvenile Court in Lansing. The goals of the project included creating a program model for the use of courts and providing effective services for youths. Referral to the project was designed to occur after charges against a youth were upheld at a preliminary hearing, and the youth admitted his guilt and agreed to participate. However, 25 percent of referred youths were randomly put into control groups. From 1976 to 1978, 132 youths, mostly white males from the 5th to 10th grade, participated in the project or control groups and were evaluated over a 3-year period. Most of their offenses were misdemeanors or minor felonies. Student volunteers serving as youth counselors were carefully screened and given special training; they were matched to each youth by sex, race, and interests. Each course of intervention lasted 18 weeks at 8 hours a week. Activities during offender-volunteer sessions varied, but the volunteers worked on establishing good relationships with their charges, helping assess problem areas, and working out strategies to deal with bad behavior or difficulties. Each juvenile offender's progress was regularly evaluated. Thus, unlike some similar experiments, the project used highly structured and intense intervention techniques. The project resulted in recidivism rates for participating youths of 40 percent after 1 year out of the program, versus 80 percent for the control group. A table and footnotes are included.