A panel design was used. Crime victims were interviewed within 1 month after the crime and again 3 months later. Four sets of predictors were examined: demographics, previctimization adjustment and stress, features of the crime incident, and victims' perceptions. Measures of distress included a range of standard indexes of adjustment and symptomatology. Demographic characteristics and victim perceptions accounted for the greatest proportions of variance in the outcome measures at Time 1 and Time 2. The strongest predictors of psychological adjustment at the end of 3 months included adjustment after 1 month, education, victim injury, victims' beliefs that their lives had been endangered during the crime episode, and victims' appraisals of the world as meaningful. These findings suggest the therapeutic usefulness of encouraging victims to rethink or reinterpret the event in ways that will restore their beliefs in the meaningfulness of the world. 5 notes, 3 tables, and 88 references
Downloads
No download available
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- Forcible, Drug-Facilitated, and Incapacitated Rape in Relation to Substance Use Problems: Results from a National Sample of College Women
- Understanding the Impact of Forensic Evidence on Homicide Clearance: An Analysis of Los Angeles Homicide Cases, 1990-2010
- Downtown Safety, Security and Economic Development Program Final Report on Phases I and II - Needs Assessment and Solutions Search, May 1985