THE REVISIONIST APPROACH DEFINES CORRUPTION IN TERMS OF DIVERGENCE FROM A SPECIFIC NORM OF ACCEPTED BEHAVIOR, EXPLAINS THE EXISTENCE OF CORRUPTION BY REFERENCE TO SOCIAL MORES AND DEFICIENCIES IN ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL SYSTEMS, AND ENUMERATES CONDITIONS IN WHICH CORRUPTION MIGHT ELICIT APPROVAL RATHER THAN CONDEMNATION. ALTHOUGH THE APPROACH HAS LED TO MORE SERIOUS STUDY OF THE PROBLEM OF ADMINISTRATIVE CORRUPTION BY NONREVISIONISTS, EXAMINATION OF REVISIONIST ASSUMPTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS REVEALS SEVERAL MISCONCEPTIONS, MOST OF WHICH ARISE BECAUSE REVISIONISTS THINK OF CORRUPT BEHAVIOR IN INDIVIDUAL, RATHER THAN SYSTEMIC, TERMS. REVISIONIST CONCEPTS DO NOT ENCOMPASS THE SITUATION IN WHICH WRONG-DOING HAS BECOME THE NORM AND TRUST HAS BECOME THE EXCEPTION RATHER THAN THE RULE. SUCH SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION IS FOUND IN MANY COUNTRIES AND JURISDICTIONS. AMONG THE DANGERS OF SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION ARE THAT IT PERPETUATES CLOSED POLITICS AND RESTRICTS ACCESS, PREVENTING REFLECTION OF SOCIAL CHANGE IN POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS; SUPPRESSES OPPOSITION; PERPETUATES CLASS, ECONOMIC, AND SOCIAL DIVISIONS; PREVENTS POLICY CHANGE; BLOCKS ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM; DIVERTS PUBLIC RESOURCES, LEADING TO A STATE OF PRIVATE AFFLUENCE AND PUBLIC SQUALOR; AND TRANSMUTES TRADITIONAL VALUES INTO INAPPROPRIATE AREAS. A LIST OF REFERENCES IS INCLUDED.
Downloads
Similar Publications
- WHITE-COLLAR CRIME - A SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY, 1980
- Remarks of James K Stewart Before the Fourth Annual International Symposium on Criminal Justice Issues on September 11, 1989
- Corruption Networks (From Policing in Central and Eastern Europe: Dilemmas of Contemporary Criminal Justice, P 595-605, 2004, Gorazd Mesko, et al., eds. -- See NCJ-207973)