Researchers have used both self-reports and official records to measure the prevalence and frequency of crime and delinquency. Few studies have compared longitudinally the validity of these two measures across gender and race/ethnicity in order to assess concordance. Using data from the Pathways to Desistance, a longitudinal study of 1,354 serious youthful offenders, we compare official records of arrest and self-reports of arrest over seven years. Findings show moderate agreement between self-reports and official arrests, which is fairly stable over time and quite similar across both gender and race/ethnicity. We do not find any race differences in the prevalence of official arrests, but do observe a gender difference in official arrests that is not accounted for by self-reported arrests. Further work on issues on the validity and reliability of different forms of offending data across demographic groups is needed. Abstract published by arrangement with Sage.
Downloads
Similar Publications
- An updated typology of commercial sexual exploitation of children and youth cases coming to law enforcement attention in 2021: Implications for identification and investigations
- Substance Abuse Treatment Centers and Local Crime.
- Online Peers and Delinquency: Distinguishing Influence, Selection, and Receptivity Effects for Offline and Online Peers with Longitudinal Data