The project focused on three general approaches for managing contextual information. One is the "case manager model," which separates functions in the laboratory between case managers and examiners, so managers can be fully informed about context, but forensic examiners are provided with only the information needed for the analytical tasks they are trained to perform. A second means of preventing contextual bias is "sequential unmasking" or "linear sequential unmasking." This procedure sequences the order of various forensic analytical tasks in order to ensure that forensic examiners make certain key analytical judgments before being exposed to potentially biasing information. The third method assessed for preventing contextual bias is "blind re-examination," in which key judgments of an initial non-blind examiner are replicated by a second examiner who has not been exposed to potentially biasing information. The research addressed the use of the three models in bloodstain pattern analysis and handwriting analysis. The ultimate goal of the research was the development of practical protocols for managing contextual information that could be implemented by bloodstain pattern analysts and handwriting analysts. This report indicates that the research findings it discusses will have a continuing role in future discussions of contextual bias in forensic science and will be a significant factor in decisions about how best to deal with the problem of contextual bias. The project's methodology is described. 15 references
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Law Enforcement Agency Practices and Policies for the Investigation of Child Sex Trafficking: Are Agencies Using Victim-Centered Approaches?
- Law Enforcement Response to Persons with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Identifying High-Priority Needs to Improve Law Enforcement Strategies
- Does Procedural Justice Moderate the Effect of Collective Efficacy on Police Legitimacy?