Because when there are multiple audio recording devices near the scene of a gunfire incident, the similarities and differences of the various recordings can either help or hamper the audio forensic examiner’s efforts to describe the sequence of events, this paper considers several examples and provides recommendations for audio forensic examiners in the interpretation of this gunshot acoustic evidence.
Audio forensic evidence is of increasing importance in law enforcement investigations because of the growing use in the United States of personal audio/video recorders carried by officers on duty, by bystanders, and by surveillance systems of businesses and residences. These recording systems capture speech, background environmental sounds, and in some cases, gunshots and other firearm sounds. (Publisher abstract provided)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Transparency and the Police: External Research, Policing and Democracy (From Policing in Central and Eastern Europe: Comparing Firsthand Knowledge With Experience From the West, P 17-30, 1996, Milan Pagon, ed. -- See NCJ-170291)
- Personal Identification Using Frontal Sinus Coding Methods: The Effect of Mixed Image Modality Comparisons
- Hidden Markov Models for DNA Sequencing