Three underlying assumptions of halfway houses were examined, and a typology of houses was developed. It was concluded that halfway houses may be as effective as any other parole program and strategy and may be more cost effective at this time. Future research should further clarify and expand on types of houses and their treatment modalities, linking treatment outcomes to recidivism and reintegration, as well as on including more adequate comparison groups. (Author abstract)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Research and Practitioner Perspectives on the Rehabilitation and Reintegration of Violent Extremists
- Pragmatic Approach to Parole Aftercare: Evaluation of a Community Reintegration Program for High-Risk Youthful Offenders
- Controlling Violent Offenders Released to the Community: An Evaluation of the Boston Reentry Initiative