This study examines the role of "working rules" that define what officers interpret as suspicious people, places, and situations. Data were drawn from observational studies of police decisionmaking in Savannah, GA and Miami-Dade, FL. Current theory and research on the use of police discretion and biased policing is focused on the decision to stop, search, or arrest a suspect. Only a few studies focus on processes through which police determine behaviors to be suspicious that influence them to initiate official police action. An analysis of the "working rules" used by officers uncovered 12 substantive categories. The article concludes with a discussion of how this information can be useful in formulating training for police departments. Abstract published by arrangement with Sage Journals.
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Reassessing the Breadth of the Protective Benefit of Immigrant Neighborhoods: A Multilevel Analysis of Violence Risk by Race, Ethnicity, and Labor Market Stratification
- Disputatiousness and the Offender-Victim Overlap
- Sexual Abuse Within Employment Settings: A Comparison of Work-Related, Intra- and Extra-Familial Child Molesters