This was done as part of a large data analysis project to implement a continuous model of DNA profile interpretation. The comparison of inter-laboratory stutter ratio data variation found that the maximum difference for any one laboratory from the average of the best fit determined by the model was 0.31 percent. These results indicate that stutter ratios calculated from samples analyzed using the same profiling kit are not expected to differ between laboratories, even those using different capillary electrophoresis platforms. A common set of laboratory parameters can be generated and used for profile interpretation at all laboratories using the same multiplex and cycle number, potentially reducing the need for individual laboratories to determine stutter ratios. (Publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Proteomic Genotyping for Individual Human Identification: Inferring SNPs in the Absence of DNA Evidence
- Assessing Methods to Enhance and Preserve Proteinaceous Impressions from the Skin of Decedents during the Early Stages of Decomposition
- Cross-validation and evaluation of the performance of methods for the elemental analysis of forensic glass by μ-XRF, ICP-MS, and LA-ICP-MS