Elements in the criminal justice system which provide restitution include compromise and settlement programs; civil remedies in criminal codes, such as damages and court costs; public compensation; and restitution imposed to avoid conviction. Substantive and procedural constraints exist on the use of restitution. The decision to impose restitution must consider the defendant's ability to pay and other demands on his or her resources. Fixing the amount and conditions of restitution in a criminal justice setting generally occurs with considerably less formality than in a civil tribunal. Summary procedures placing the burden on the defendant to contest the restitution order appear most common. Sentencing judges tend to rely on recommendations of presentence investigators or staff from special restitution programs rather than probation officers. While the scope of restitution in criminal courts seems to be expanding, procedural mechanisms offering protection to the defendant have not developed in a corresponding manner. The article includes 417 footnotes. (Author summary modified)
Downloads
No download available
Similar Publications
- Victims’ Rights, Victims’ Expectations, and Law Enforcement Workers’ Constraints in Cases of Murder
- Testing Gender-Differentiated Models of the Mechansms Linking Polyvictimization and Youth Offending Numbing and Callousness Versus Dissociation and Borderline Traits
- “They had to change the model to fit the victim, versus the victim having to fit the model”: Innovative solutions in community response to commercial sexual exploitation