The general problems encountered in making inferences about truth and deception from physiological recordings are described, and various methods for designing tests of deception are explained and evaluated in light of these problems. The review concludes that a number of cardiovascular, electrodermal, and respiratory measures have been shown to be effective in discriminating between truth and deception. Other promising measures are identified, along with suggestions for conducting laboratory research that will be maximally generalizable field applications of detection of deception. (Publisher abstract)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- GeoVisuals: a visual analytics approach to leverage the potential of spatial videos and associated geonarratives
- Cross-Sectional Analysis of Sleep-Promoting and Wake-Promoting Drug Use on Health, Fatigue-Related Error, and Near-Crashes in Police Officers
- The relationship between crime information centers and crime: A micro-synthetic evaluation of a district-level policing strategy