The authors discuss their research study to assess impacts of anti-theft strategies in university classrooms that focus on fortifying the objects being stolen, for example, through the use of labels indicating property ownership.
For the past three decades, property crime has been the single largest form of victimization reported to campus police and security. While prior research has focused extensively on improving security in high-theft areas around campus, surprisingly little attention has been paid to efforts at fortifying the targets of theft themselves. To address this gap, the present study employed a completely randomized experimental design testing the effect of an anti-theft strategy against a control strategy on property loss among 22 university classrooms. Compared to classrooms receiving property labeled with an anti-theft message, classrooms receiving property without such labels were significantly more likely to have their property removed. While these results are still in the pilot phase, the authors suggest that universities and colleges should identify their property, indicating to whom it belongs, if they wish to reduce property loss. Publisher Abstract Provided
- How Helpful Is Bystander Intervention? Perspectives of Dating and Sexual Violence Survivors
- Randomized Control Trial Findings of a Wraparound Program for Dually Involved Youth
- Breaking the Homelessness–Jail Cycle With Housing First: Results From the Denver Supportive Housing Social Impact Bond Initiative