Fingerprints and touched items are important sources of DNA for STR profiling, since this evidence can be recovered in a wide variety of criminal offenses; however, there are some fundamental difficulties in working with these samples, including variability in quantity and quality of extracted DNA. In the current study, the amplification protocols tested were AmpFLSTR Identifiler, using either 28 or 31 amplification cycles, and Identifiler Plus, using 32 amplification cycles. The study found that the HighSens and Zygem extraction methods were significantly better in their DNA yields than the one-tube method. Identifiler Plus significantly increased the quality of the STR profiles for the one-tube extraction; however, this effect could not be verified for the other extraction methods. Furthermore, microscopic analysis of single fingerprints revealed that some individuals tended to shed more material onto glass slides than others; however, a dense deposit of skin flakes did not strongly correlate with a high quality STR profile. (Publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Optimization and Validation of a Probe Capture/NGS Assay for Sequencing the Whole Mitochondrial Genome on Forensically Relevant Samples
- Development of a spectral X-ray fluorescence database to strengthen the scientific foundations for the forensic analysis and interpretation of modern soda-lime glass
- Recommendations for the forensic analysis and interpretation of glass from contemporary portable electronic devices by refractive index measurement and micro-X-ray fluorescence spectrometry