Doubts about the efficacy of rehabilitation, together with persistently high rates of violent juvenile crime, placed violent juvenile offenders at the center of an ideological debate between proponents of traditional juvenile justice policies and those who would restrict or eliminate the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. Recent research has shown that effective and proportionate correctional interventions in the juvenile justice system can advance crime control and rehabilitative policies. The existence of such programs obviates the rationale for judicial or legislative exclusion of violent juvenile offenders from the juvenile justice system. Policies to reallocate resources and reorganize juvenile corrections services should emphasize reintegration efforts to sustain institutional treatment through the process of community reentry. 2 tables, over 75 references. (Publisher abstract)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Race and Ethnic Differences in Mental Health Need and Services Received in Justice-Involved Youth
- Pathways to Safety and Housing Stability Among Intimate Partner Violence Survivors Receiving Supportive Housing Services: A Mixed Methods Analysis
- Beyond Adverse Childhood Experiences: What Should be Considered for Trauma-Focused Adolescent Mental Health Risk Assessments?