A large body of research has found that crime is much more likely to occur at certain places relative to others. Attempting to capitalize on this finding to maximize crime prevention, many police administrators have sought to narrow their department's operational focus and allocate resources and attention to the most problematic locations; however, in the face of a growing number of technological advances in crime forecasting that have facilitated this trend, it is still unclear how to best identify the most appropriate set of places to which resources and attention should be directed. The current study used the Theory of Risky Places as a guide, and employed kernel density estimation (KDE) to measure crime exposures and risk terrain modeling (RTM) to identify crime vulnerabilities, with the expectation that crime would be predicted more accurately by integrating the outputs from these two methods. To test this hypothesis, the analysis used 1 year of data on street robbery in Brooklyn, New York. A common metric, the prediction accuracy index (PAI), was computed for KDE, RTM, and the integrated approach, over 1- month and 3-month intervals. The study found that the integrated approach, on average and most frequently, produced the most accurate predictions. These results demonstrate that place-based policing and related policies can be improved via actionable intelligence produced from multiple crime analysis tools that are designed to measure unique aspects of the spatial dynamics of crime. 1 figure and 81 references (Publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Multi-Modal Analysis of Body-Worn Camera Recordings: Evaluating Novel Methods for Measuring Police Implementation of Procedural Justice
- Deconvolution of Dust Mixtures by Latent Dirichlet Allocation in Forensic Science
- An Argument Against Presenting Interval Quantifications as a Surrogate for the Value of Evidence