This paper examines issues concerning the use of volunteers and paraprofessionals in parole and provides information on their current use. A definite social distance exists between a large segment of the parole clientele and the predominantly middle-class professional corrections workers. Volunteers and paraprofessionals can bridge this gap. The study gathered data on volunteers from 35 parole field agencies across the country. These programs vary in their requirements and functions. Qualifications for volunteers ranged from none to a requirement for training, interviews, and background checks. The qualifications for paraprofessionals were more stringent. The functions served by volunteers and paraprofessionals range from support staff to direct caseload supervision. No jurisdiction reported negative findings in the evaluations of their programs. Despite the fact that evaluations of these programs are positive, there is evidence of decreasing use of the ex-offender strategy in parole service delivery. Possible explanations include attitudes of resistance, fiscal limitations, and loss of interest by the ex-offender employees. Another factor could be the move away from parole towards stricter punishment. Twenty notes and tables are provided.
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Community Supervision Officers' Perceptions of Risk and Desistance Among Clients on Probation or Parole A Case Study in Georgia
- Examining the Impact of Permitless Firearm Legislation and COVID-19 on Crime and Arrests in Three Urban Cities
- We Need to Not Fear You: Essential Factors Identified by Sworn Officers and Civilian Staff for Implementation and Expansion of a Co-Response Program