U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Assessment of Alternatives for a National Computerized Criminal History System

NCJ Number
86624
Date Published
1982
Length
211 pages
Annotation
The United States has a national criminal history system that is partly manual and partly computerized, including criminal record and fingerprint repositories maintained by the FBI's criminal identification file (Ident), 49 State identification bureaus, and other record systems. Thus, most of the building blocks for a national computerized criminal history (CCH) record system are already in place.
Abstract
A national CCH system could be designed in two ways: (1) criminal history records for all offenders could be stored in a central national repository; (2) a national repository could be limited to records of Federal offenders, with State records stored in State repositories. Most experts favor the latter, with only Federal offender records and an index to State offenders (the Interstate Identification Index or III) maintained at the national level along with a national fingerprint file on serious criminal offenders. A national CCH system providing complete, timely, and verifiable information will improve the functioning of the criminal justice system, particularly criminal investigations and bail decisions. The system could have important implications for employment and licensure, Federal-State relationships, and civil and constitutional rights, as well as public safety and the administration of justice. Implementation of any national CCH system would raise a number of issues requiring congressional attention; legislation should address access, review, and challenge procedures as well as criminal penalties, privacy standards, and other issues. The report also discusses current use of various systems (Ident, the National Crime Information Center, etc.), including sample records, cost data, and computer technologies used. Footnotes, data tables, and illustrations are included. Appendixes present a discussion of NCIC's 'hot files,' lists of State officials responding to a user survey, and an index.