U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Can Childhood Factors Predict Workplace Deviance?

NCJ Number
247172
Journal
Justice Quarterly Volume: 31 Issue: 4 Dated: August 2014 Pages: 664-692
Author(s)
Nicole Leeper Piquero; Terrie E. Moffitt
Date Published
August 2014
Length
29 pages
Annotation
This paper examines two types of workplace deviance: production and property deviance separately for males and females.
Abstract
Compared to the more common focus on street crime, empirical research on workplace deviance has been hampered by highly select samples, cross-sectional research designs, and limited inclusion of relevant predictor variables that bear on important theoretical debates. A key debate concerns the extent to which childhood conduct-problem trajectories influence crime over the life-course, including adults' workplace crime, whether childhood low self-control is a more important determinant than trajectories, and/or whether each or both of these childhood factors relate to later criminal activity. This paper provides evidence on this debate by examining two types of workplace deviance: production and property deviance separately for males and females. The authors used data from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, a birth cohort followed into adulthood, to examine how childhood factors (conduct-problem trajectories and low self-control) and then adult job characteristics predict workplace deviance at age 32. Analyses revealed that none of the childhood factors matter for predicting female deviance in the workplace but that conduct-problem trajectories did account for male workplace deviance. Abstract published by arrangement with Taylor and Francis.