U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

DUE PROCESS DENIAL NOT PRESUMED WHEN KNOWLEDGE OF PAST MISDEEDS IS POSSESSED BY THE JURY - 'TOTALITY OF CIRCUMSTANCES' TEST WILL BE USED TO DETERMINE FAIRNESS OF TRIAL - MURPHY V FLORIDA

NCJ Number
31662
Journal
American Criminal Law Review Volume: 13 Issue: 2 Dated: (FALL 1975) Pages: 285-298
Author(s)
J D GOLDSMITH
Date Published
1975
Length
14 pages
Annotation
THE SUPREME COURT HELD THAT MERE JUROR KNOWLEDGE OF A DEFENDANT'S CRIMINAL PAST WOULD NOT GIVE RISE TO A PRESUMPTION OF A DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS: THE 'TOTALITY OF CIRCUMSTANCES TEST' IS DESCRIBED.
Abstract
PREJUDICE WILL BE PRESUMED IF THE FACUTAL SITUATION IS SUFFICIENTLY EGREGIOUS SO THAT THE DEFENDANT IS NOT AFFORDED THE 'SOLEMNITY AND SOBRIETY TO WHICH HE IS ENTITLED IN A SYSTEM THAT SUBSCRIBES TO ANY NOTION OF FAIRNESS AND REJECTS THE VERDICT OF THE MOB.' HOWEVER, IF A FACTUAL SITUATION IS NOT SUFFICIENTLY EGREGIOUS TO GIVE RISE TO A PRESUMPTION OF PREJUDICE, THE TOTALITY OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES WILL BE EXAMINED TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT A PETITIONER HAS RECEIVED A FUNDAMENTALLY FAIR TRIAL BY A PANEL OF IMPARTIAL JURORS. IN THIS CASE, THE PRESUMPTION OF DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS IS DETERMINED BY VOIR DIRE TESTIMONY, VOIR DIRE STATISTICS, AND THE COMMUNITY ATMOSPHERE AS REFLECTED IN THE NEWS MEDIA.