U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Dutch Victim Policy: A Comparative Perspective

NCJ Number
190702
Journal
Judicial Explorations (Justiteile verkenningen) Volume: 27 Issue: 3 Dated: 2001 Pages: 43-57
Author(s)
M. Brienen; E. H. Hoegen
Date Published
2001
Length
15 pages
Annotation
This paper examines how Dutch policies for crime victims compare with the guidelines for victim services set by the Council of Europe.
Abstract
It is widely accepted that crime victims should be able to participate in the criminal proceedings of their cases. Guidelines for the legal rights of victims have been provided in authoritative documents such as the 1985 Recommendation of the Council of Europe. A comparative study of how this Recommendation had been implemented in the member countries of the Council of Europe showed that the Netherlands had been most effective in complying with the guidelines. Four factors have been instrumental in this success; nevertheless, improvements can still be made; for example, crime victims should have the right to be represented by a victim advocate, to address the court, and to act as an auxiliary prosecutor; however, the right of sex-crime victims to have a lawyer-advocate may adversely affect the authorities' attention to the rights of victims of other types of crimes. If the introduction of a victim impact statement is considered, attention should be given to its purpose. The right of a crime victim to become an auxiliary prosecutor should be established as a means of enabling the victim to participate in criminal proceedings. 10 references