U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Fighting Over Trivial Things: Explaining the Issue of Contention in Violent Altercations

NCJ Number
234092
Journal
Criminology Volume: 49 Issue: 1 Dated: February 2011 Pages: 61-94
Author(s)
Elizabeth Griffiths; Carolyn Yule; Rosemary Gartner
Date Published
February 2011
Length
34 pages
Annotation
This study examined trivial altercations of incarcerated women.
Abstract
Violent altercations can lead to serious injury and death, and yet some interpersonal disputes that prompt physical violence originate over what are seemingly trivial issues. This study evaluates the theoretical premise that violence stemming from what typically are defined as trivial altercations can be explained by what is at stake in these conflicts; trivial altercations, or fights about "nothing," actually represent symbolic contests of dominance and deference. These status contests are necessary primarily when the social relationship between opponents is symmetricalwhen a dominance hierarchy is not clearly established. Data from interviews with incarcerated women in Ontario, Canada, show that relationship symmetry strongly predicts the issue of contention in their physically violent altercations. These findings suggest that, when violence erupts over trivial issues, both parties to the altercation essentially are locked in a battle for social rank. (Published Abstract) Tables and references