NCJ Number
              37536
          Journal
  Hastings Law Journal Volume: 28 Issue: 1 Dated: (SEPTEMBER 1976) Pages: 37-71
Date Published
  1976
Length
              35 pages
          Annotation
              THE AUTHOR EXAMINES THE UNDERREPRESENTATION OF MINORITY GROUPS ON GRAND JURIES AND ARGUES THAT ONLY RANDOMLY SELECTED JURIES CAN FULFILL THE GRAND JURY'S HISTORICAL PURPOSE.
          Abstract
              THE HISTORY OF THE GRAND JURY IS REVIEWED AS IS SUPREME COURT POLICY REGARDING THE GRAND JURY. POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS OF GRAND JURY POWER AND PROSECUTORIAL MANIPULATION. FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL JUROR SELECTION PROCEDURES ARE EXPLORED. THE 'BLUE RIBBON' SELECTION PROCEDURES FOR JURIES IN CALIFORNIA, TEXAS, AND NEW YORK ARE COMPARED. A STATE BY STATE SUMMARY OF GRAND JURY SELECTION PROCEDURES AND DUTIES IS APPENDED.
          