U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Identifying Law Enforcement Needs for Access to Digital Evidence in Remote Data Centers

NCJ Number
251674
Author(s)
Michael J. D. Vermeer; Dulani Woods; Brian A. Jackson
Date Published
2018
Length
3 pages
Annotation
This report aims to improve legitimate law enforcement access to and use of remotely held digital evidence in a manner that is legal, effective, timely, and understandable, with a focus on the discussion of the expert panel that addressed this issue.
Abstract
This issue is significant because state and local law enforcement agencies, in their investigations of crimes in their jurisdictions, increasingly need to obtain data and digital evidence held extraterritorially or by transnational companies. In addressing this issue, the expert panelists called for information exchanges for points of contact and on the types of data held by service providers, devices, and apps. The panelists acknowledged that an adversarial relationship often exists between law enforcement and various data sources. The panelists discussed means of developing a shared perspective and improving cooperation. Participants also identified several needs related to improving the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) process. There was large agreement that the current state of the MLAT process is not meeting the increasing need for law enforcement access to extraterritorial digital evidence. Suggestions include the creation of an online docketing system; research and analysis on MLAT data to identify bottlenecks; the development of a uniform system of jurisdiction; better training and information for U.S. trainers of foreign nationals on U.S. law; and research on expanding the MLAT regime to cover current gaps. Other recommendations pertain to training for investigators on the creation and appropriate bounding of requests to providers for data; better standards for the creation of and compliance with data requests to providers; and improved communication between law enforcement investigators and service providers.