If Brain Scans Really Detected Deception, Who Would Volunteer to be Scanned?

• NCJ Number: 232588
• Journal: Journal of Forensic Sciences Volume: 55 Issue: 5 Dated: September 2010 Pages: 1352-1355
• Author(s): Sean A. Spence, M.D., F.R.C.Psych; Alexandra Hope-Urwin, R.N., M.Med.Sci.; Sudheer T. Lankappa, M.R.C.Psych.; Jean Woodhead; Jenny C.L. Burgess, B.Med.Sci.; Alice V. Mackay, B.Med.Sci.
• Date Published: September 2010
• Length: 4 pages
• Publication Format: Article
• Publication Type: Report (Study/Research)
• Language: English
• Country: United States of America

Annotation

Recent neuroimaging studies investigating the neural correlates of deception among healthy people, have raised the possibility that such methods may eventually be applied during legal proceedings. Were this so, who would volunteer to be scanned? The authors report a "natural experiment" casting some light upon this question.

Abstract

Following broadcast of a television series describing our team's investigative neuroimaging of deception in 2007, the authors received unsolicited (public) correspondence for 12 months. Using a customized template to examine this material, three independent assessors unanimously rated 30 of an initial 56 communications as unequivocally constituting requests for a "scan" (to demonstrate their author's "innocence"). Compared with the rest, these index communications were more likely to originate from incarcerated males, who were also more likely to engage in further correspondence. Hence, in conclusion, if neuroimaging were to become an acceptable means of demonstrating innocence then incarcerated males may well constitute those volunteering for such investigation. (Published Abstracts)