ILLEGALLY OBTAINED EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CASES A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF A CLASSIC MISMATCH, PART 2

• NCJ Number: 15504
• Journal: Texas Law Review Volume: 52 Issue: 4 Dated: (APRIL 1974) Pages: 621-702
• Author(s): H W BAADE
• Date Published: 1974
• Length: 182 pages
• Corporate Author: University of Texas
• Publication Format: Article
• Language: English
• Country: United States of America

Annotation

REVIEW OF UNITED STATES, ENGLISH, SCOTTISH, WEST GERMAN, AND CANADIAN JUDICIAL DECISIONS AND CASE LAW REGARDING THE APPLICABILITY OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE IN CIVIL CASES.

Abstract

THE DISCUSSION OF UNITED STATES CASE LAW COVERS CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY LIMITATIONS IN CASES INVOLVING EVIDENCE ILLEGALLY OBTAINED BY GOVERNMENT AGENTS, ILLEGAL INTERCEPTION OF PRIVATE COMMUNICATIONS, EVIDENCE ILLEGALLY OBTAINED BY PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS, AND INSTANCE WHERE A GOVERNMENT DELEGATES A PUBLIC FUNCTION TO A PRIVATE GROUP, ALSO CONSIDERED ARE 'SUBCONSTITUTIONAL', NON-STATUTORY LIMITATIONS IN THE AREAS OF STOLEN DOCUMENTS, 'EQUITABLE COPYRIGHT', PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENTIALITY, AND ILLEGAL PROCEDURE. (FOR PART ONE OF THIS ARTICLE, SEE NCJ-12714).