U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Reward and Punishment in (Post)Modern Society-Criminological Contribution to the Theory of Sanctioning

NCJ Number
231544
Journal
Revija za Kriminalistiko in Kriminologijo Volume: 2 Issue: 61 Dated: April 2010 Pages: 164-167
Author(s)
Zoran Kanduc, LL.D.
Date Published
April 2010
Length
14 pages
Annotation
This article examines reward and punishment in (post)modern society.
Abstract
When talking about rewarding, the first thought that runs through one's head is money. However, the designation "reward" includes also gratifications related to drives (or emotional dispositions), which can be classified in the semantic space of the Greek notion thymos (meaning in particular the need of the human animal to be noticed, recognized, accepted, appreciated, or to be worthy of attention, kindness, and love in a successful relationship with "important others"). An individual's perception that he/she is undeservedly in unjustly insufficiently rewarded has clear criminological implications, manifested by feeling of humiliation, shame, resentment, envy, anger, revengefulness, hate, a feeling of relative deprivation and aggressiveness. On the other hand, it is more or less clear that punishment has become in our time a considerably more difficult control activity, not least due to extremely frequent violations of norms (or because of a progressive decline of "authority", which is a socio-psychological phenomenon that is simultaneously cause and consequence of a growth of cynicism, opportunism, narcissistic "individualism" competitive struggle, distrust in principal institutions and even in people in general, an increased self-confidence of both powerful and less powerful "criminals", the striking selectivity of formal and informal agencies of sanctioning, the class nature of legal prescriptions, the normalized corruptness and greed of political and business elites, the unwillingness or incapacity of members of the judicial proletariat to exercise adequately their power and perform their heteronomous work etc.) The "crisis" of punishment often seems to contribute to quasi-judicial reactions (to subjectively perceived wrongs) in private (individual or group) arrangements and also encourages a tendency to release accumulated anger against one or other category of the handiest "scapegoats" or "good enemies". (Published Abstract)

Downloads

No download available

Availability