U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Sixth Amendment: Applicability of Right to Counsel of Choice to Forfeiture of Attorneys' Fees

NCJ Number
123628
Journal
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume: 80 Issue: 4 Dated: (Winter 1990) Pages: 1154-1189
Author(s)
M Hardy
Date Published
1990
Length
36 pages
Annotation
This analysis of the United States Supreme Court's 1989 decisions regarding the effects on the right to counsel of the criminal forfeiture provisions of the Comprehensive Forfeiture Act (CFA) concludes that the law should be amended to assure that defendants can exercise this right.
Abstract
CFA consists of the forfeiture provisions that are parts of both the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and the Continue Criminal Enterprise (CCE) statute. In its decisions in the United States v. Monsanto and Caplin and Drysdale, Chartered v. United States, the Supreme Court held that these provisions do not exempt attorneys' fees from assets subject to criminal forfeiture and that the forfeiture of these assets is therefore constitutional. This decision suggests that the right to counsel is of minimal significance. Instead, the Court is placing increasing emphasis on the right to effective assistance of counsel, which is almost impossible to prove. A Fifth Amendment challenge may succeed, but legislation to define lawyers who do not engage in fraudulent transactions as bona fide purchasers would be more desirable. 227 footnotes.