U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Strain, Coping, and Socioeconomic Status: Coping Histories and Present Choices

NCJ Number
245793
Journal
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Volume: 29 Issue: 2 Dated: June 2013 Pages: 217-250
Author(s)
Ekaterina V. Botchkovar; Charles R. Tittle; Olena Antonaccio
Date Published
June 2013
Length
34 pages
Annotation
The study analyzes the effects of past and contemporaneous strain/negative emotions and prior coping efforts on various coping strategies across three SES groupings using negative binomial, ordered logit, and OLS regression.
Abstract
Using household survey data from three major cities in foreign countries, the authors add to research concerning General Strain Theory (GST) by focusing on aspects that have been ignored or under-researched. First, the authors address questions concerning SES variations in the operation of the processes of GST, with particular focus on whether various relationships specified by the theory are more likely in the lower SES group. Second, the authors explore the extent to which prior coping strategies influence subsequent coping choices. Finally, the authors seek to determine the links between SES, coping histories, and subsequent coping choices. The study analyzes the effects of past and contemporaneous strain/negative emotions and prior coping efforts on various coping strategies across three SES groupings using negative binomial, ordered logit, and OLS regression. The authors found that, with some variations, the basic processes of GST are operative across all SES categories. However, whereas strain appears to have a moderate association with alcohol-related and criminal coping strategies, avoidant coping appears to be largely irrelevant for anybody who faces strain. The data also demonstrate that specific forms of prior coping partially influence the types of coping employed later. But, with few exceptions, these effects are not more pronounced among those of lower SES. In sum, the findings suggest that individuals in various SES groupings may prefer certain types of coping, whereas different types of attempted coping may predispose individuals to specific forms of subsequent adaptation. (Published Abstract)