U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Targeted Killing: Self-Defense Preemption, and the War on Terrorism

NCJ Number
230433
Journal
Journal of Strategic Security Volume: 2 Issue: 2 Dated: May 2009 Pages: 1-52
Author(s)
Thomas Byron Hunter, M.A.
Date Published
May 2009
Length
52 pages
Annotation
This paper discusses the use of "targeted killings" as a weapon to combat terrorism.
Abstract
The author of this article uses a literature review, interviews of selected individuals, and independent analyses to examine the dynamic of "targeted killing" as it relates to modern international terrorism and an individual state's rights to self-defense. The main findings from the analyses are that targeted killings: are wholly different from assassinations and other intentional targeting used during wartime; are a politically risky undertaking with the potential for negative international implications; are a proven tactic for some terrorist groups that may, in the future, cause states to reconsider their decision not to use targeted killings; can impact terrorists and terrorist groups at the strategic, operational, and tactical level; can have both negative and unintentionally positive impacts on terrorist groups; and can expose civilians to unintentional harm. The article provides a definition of targeted killing, compares targeted killing to assassination and self-defense, and provides case studies of states' use of targeted killing. Tables, appendix, endnotes, and selected bibliography