U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Urban Structure and Victimization

NCJ Number
82908
Author(s)
D L Decker; D Shichor; R M O'Brien
Date Published
1982
Length
116 pages
Annotation
This book examines the relationships between structural characteristics of 26 major U.S. cities and 1973-74 victimization rates from the National Crime Surveys (NCS), with special discussions of crimes against juveniles and the elderly.
Abstract
The authors trace the growth of victimology as an established discipline and review 19th- and 20th-century studies on the ecological patterns of crime. A comparison of the validity of crime rates based on the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) and the NCS notes the limitations of both approaches, concluding that the NCS is probably more accurate. The book outlines a three-category classification of criminal victimization using NCS data: property crimes with contact between offender and victim, property crimes without contact, and nonproperty assaultive crimes. When this framework was applied to relationships between criminal victimizations and population density no positive correlations were found. The study also investigated the relationship between victimization rates and the number of police per capita and population density. Correlations depended on the type of offense, but suggest that increasing the size of the police department could reduce property crimes without contact and nonproperty assaultive crimes. An analysis of the rates of victimization of juveniles in the NCS cities showed that population density was negatively linked to household larceny, burglary, personal theft, and motor vehicle theft, perhaps because of the increased visibility that occurs in high-density areas. A similar examination of household victimization rates among the elderly revealed that three characteristics were tied to victimization: population density, socioeconomic conditions, and percentage of residents on public assistance. The final chapter explores the implications of these findings for research and social policy. Tables, more than 230 references, and an index are provided. The appendixes contain a description of the NCS design, definitions of crimes used in the UCR and NCS, and a table comparing NCS and UCR rates and characteristics of the 26 cities.