This article examines why incarceration of offenders has not paid off as an effective means of reducing crime rates. The author examines the current level of incarceration rates and crime rates to determine whether mass incarceration has been effective at lowering the crime rates. Research indicates that while mass incarceration has helped reduce crime rates, the effects have been considerably smaller than anticipated, and that the current level of benefits from mass incarceration are too low compared to its costs. In addition, with more offenders leaving prison with long criminal records and histories of substance abuse, unemployment, and homelessness, an increased effort needs to be put forth to help them successfully reenter society. Recent rehabilitation programs that incorporate proven principles and aimed at specific categories of offenders have been successful at reducing recidivism rates. These programs include intensive drug treatment programs, education, and vocational skills training programs for offenders while in prison. Other efforts include improvements in probation and parole programs that focus on individual cases as opposed to a one-size-fits-all approach, and community partnerships to provide resources and assistance to recently released offenders.
Downloads
No download available
Similar Publications
- Phase Two of ETA: Evaluation of Technology-based Advocacy Services: Assessment of Program Outcomes, Technical Report/Final Progress Report
- Garden Grove Police Department Public Safety Dispatcher Training and Evaluation Guide
- Mixed signals from prison? Postsecondary vocational credentials, race, and postrelease employment