NCJ Number
89394
Journal
Justice System Journal Volume: 7 Issue: 3 Dated: (Winter 1982) Pages: 449-469
Date Published
1982
Length
25 pages
Annotation
The article summarizes the findings of an empirical study of the effects of court structure on court management and performance, giving particular attention to the structure supported by advocates of unification.
Abstract
It is argued that unification can be best understood as an effort to define the courts as formal organizations. An assessment of the impact of such changes, therefore, must take account of alternative forms for structuring a judicial system. The field work demonstrated that no simple organizational structure will meet equally well all three types of goals, that is, improved quality of justice, better court management and enhanced political position. Moreover, the two dimensions at the heart of organizational design -- centralization and consolidation -- had independent, sometimes conflicting effects. Finally, the effect of any structural design depends, in large measure, on the type of adjudicatory process involved. (Author abstract)
Date Published: January 1, 1982
Downloads
No download available
Similar Publications
- The Color of Risk: Unpacking the Implications of Actuarial Risk Prediction at Sentencing
- Habeas Litigation in U.S. District Courts: An Empirical Study of Habeas Corpus Cases Filed by State Prisoners Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Final Technical Report
- MANDATORY PRISON SENTENCES - THEIR PROJECTED EFFECTS ON CRIME AND PRISON POPULATIONS