U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Bennington County Integrated Domestic Violence Docket Project: Process Evaluation Final Report

NCJ Number
241395
Author(s)
Robin Adler, J.D., Ph.D.
Date Published
February 2013
Length
25 pages
Annotation
This report presents the results of an outcome evaluation on Bennington County's Integrated Domestic Violence Docket Project.
Abstract
The evaluation found that by integrating all domestic violence related matters involving the same people, Bennington County's Integrated Domestic Violence Docket project was able to achieve its goals of preventing further abuse and violence and remediating the effects of prior abuse on family members. Results indicate that the project is a promising approach for reducing post-program recidivism among defendants convicted of domestic violence; the project appears to be a promising approach for reducing the number of post-program reconvictions among defendants convicted of domestic violence; recidivists from both study groups engaged in a variety of different post-program criminal behaviors which suggests a high level of service needs beyond the presenting problem of domestic violence; and the project processed domestic violence cases twice as fast as the Bennington County District Court and three times faster than other district courts statewide. The Integrated Domestic Violence Docket Project in Bennington County, VT, was initiated in September 2007 to provide immediate responses to domestic violence events by coordinating Family and Criminal Division cases. The program follows the one family, one judge idea and works by allowing a single judge, 1 day each week, to have immediate access to all relevant information concerning the case regardless of the traditional docket, and to gather all appropriate stakeholders together regardless of any traditionally limited roles. Data were collected from an analysis of the criminal history records of 2 groups of offenders: 140 offenders who were referred to the project and 102 offenders whose cases were prosecuted in the county's district court without the benefit of the project. Tables and figures