U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

First Amendment Challenges to Hate Crime Legislation: Where's the Speech?

NCJ Number
194300
Journal
Criminal Justice Ethics Volume: 11 Issue: 2 Dated: Summer/Fall 1992 Pages: 6-20
Author(s)
James Weinstein
Date Published
1992
Length
15 pages
Annotation
This article challenges the claim that enhancing punishment for racially motivated crimes violates the First Amendment.
Abstract
In 1991, Susan Gellman published an article claiming that hate crime legislation violated the First Amendment. This paper challenges the claim that such laws are invalid on their face -- that is, regardless of the circumstances in which they are applied, a statute that enhances the punishment for racially motivated crimes violates the First Amendment. However, if hate crime legislation is applied to enhance the punishment for crimes committed through speech, or to punish someone for using racist language or expressing bigoted ideas, obvious First Amendment issues arise. The article states that such potential misapplication does not warrant voiding the statute on its face. In addition, it attempts to show that the attack on the constitutionality of hate crime legislation undermines the validity of all antidiscrimination laws. The article also includes discussion of retributivism and legal moralism, and the added injury of racial violence. Notes