NCJ Number
191402
Journal
American Journal of Criminal Justice Volume: 25 Issue: 2 Dated: Spring 2001 Pages: 253-268
Editor(s)
William G. Doerner
Date Published
2001
Length
16 pages
Annotation
This study determined whether or not perceived importance of correctional goals influenced public attitudes towards the changes within the prison system.
Abstract
In the past couple of years many States took steps to reduce or eliminate prison amenities. There is a debate about whether or not these changes occurred in connection with changes in public opinion. There was no direct evidence that public opinion influenced these changes. One aspect that was analyzed was whether or not utility could persuade people to accept keeping of inmate programs and services. Another aspect that was analyzed was the issue of eligibility. This referred to the idea that inmates received benefits from the government that law- abiding citizens paid for. Correctional goals were also assessed. To achieve this goal, a survey method was used. This survey consisted of 26 amenities, which included programs, services, and accommodations. It was concluded that many people wanted to eliminate entertainment privileges. Second, it was also discovered that respondents were in favor of keeping rehabilitative services like counseling, vocational job training, and basic literacy programs. It was also shown many people wanted to retain books and family visits. Third, it was demonstrated that peoples’ views were influenced by utility and how they felt about correctional goals. According to the author, people’s views were not as harsh as some assumed, and if amenities were useful and did not give prisoners advantages over the poor, retention was supported. People want institutions that are humane and willing to help individuals to readjust into society again. Tables, references